Ambiguity Attitudes: An Experimental Investigation
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper reports the results of experiments designed to test (a) whether and to what extent individuals display non-neutral ambiguity attitudes in their choice behavior and (b) if and how do ambiguity attitudes change as a result of interpersonal interactions and persuation. To address the first question we designed and conducted experiments involving individual choice between betting on ambiguous and unambiguous events of their choice. We found that a large majority of subjects display ambiguityneutral attitudes, many others display ambiguity-incoherent attitudes, and few subjects display either ambiguity-averse attitudes or ambiguity-seeking attitudes. To address the second question we introduced a new experimental design with a built-in incentive to persuade. We found that interpersonal interactions without incentive to persuade have no effect on behavior, but when incentives were introduced, the ambiguity-neutral subjects were better able to persuade ambiguity seeking and ambiguity-incoherent subjects to follow ambiguity-neutral choice behavior. No such influence was detected with respect to ambiguity-neutral subjects.
منابع مشابه
An experimental investigation of imprecision attitude and its relation with risk attitude and impatience
We report in this paper the result of three experiments on risk, ambiguity and time attitude. The first two differed by the population considered (students vs. general population) while the third one used a different protocol and concerned students and portfolio managers. We find quite a lot of heterogeneity at the individual level. Of principal interest was the elicitation of risk, time and am...
متن کاملAmbiguity in Asset Markets: Theory and Experiment
This paper studies the impact of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion on equilibrium asset prices and portfolio holdings in competitive financial markets. It argues that attitudes toward ambiguity are heterogeneous across the population, just as attitudes toward risk are heterogeneous across the population, but that heterogeneity of attitudes toward ambiguity has different implications than heterog...
متن کاملExplaining Attitudes Towards Ambiguity: An Experimental Test of the Comparative Ignorance Hypothesis
Many theories have been put forward to explain attitudes towards ambiguity. This paper reports on an experiment designed to test for the existence of Comparative Ignorance when it is tested over different levels of probabilities. A total of 93 subjects valued a series of gambles, one of which was played out for real. The results do not lend support to the theory, although the relationship betwe...
متن کاملExperiments on Compound Risk in Relation to Simple Risk and to Ambiguity
W conduct experiments measuring individual behavior under compound risk, simple risk, and ambiguity. We focus on (1) treatment of compound risks relative to simple risks and (2) the relationship between compound risk attitudes and ambiguity attitudes. We find that compound risks are valued differently than corresponding reduced simple risks. These differences measure compound risk attitudes. Th...
متن کاملReference dependent ambiguity
Motivated by experimental and empirical evidence, I develop a theoretical framework to study how reference-points – such as a status quo, endowment or default option – can distort the way an individual perceives and responds to ambiguity. I use this framework to characterize various models of reference-dependent ambiguity, and provide behavioral foundations for comparative ambiguity attitudes a...
متن کامل